gulf of mexico

...now browsing by tag

 
 

I Was Green When Green Wasn’t Cool!

Monday, May 31st, 2010

With apologies to Barbara Mandrell

*I wrote this originally in October of 2008, before we knew the outcome of the election, the extent of this recession, that Copenhagen would fizzle (shoulda seen that one coming) and that many of the suppositions made in “Hot, Flat, etc.” would be put in storage because there wasn’t any damn money to fuel the consumerism engine.  They haven’t been proven wrong, however.  They are just hibernating, waiting for the rainy season to return.

Obviously, I am still waiting for the Obama administration to step up.

And now we have this unbelievably horrible oil well run amok in the Gulf of Mexico, (which anyone with more brains than Sarah Palin knew would happen eventually); corporations and communities are looking at Great Lakes water with impure thoughts and intent; and the Asian Carp Spill is just waiting to happen in the Chicago Sanitary Canal, a spill of biological pollution that will kill the Great Lakes as surely as the BP oil debacle is killing marine and estuarine food chains out in the Gulf of Mexico.

We nattering naybobs have been trying to point out that environmental oversight is a pretty good use of the federal government, and we should insist that that work happen in an unhurried, non-biased way.

But we’re a nation of addicts, and we don’t care if the trash gets carried out, the dishes washed, or the baby’s diaper gets changed as long as we don’t run out of oil.  You won’t hear that coming from the Oil Cartels because they only want to make money, and addicts are a crucial part of their business plan. You won’t hear that coming from the majority of politicians, because addicts are the best liars on earth.  They lie so convincingly that they have fooled themselves into believing that everything is just fine and normal.  But even the most casual observer sees things are neither fine nor normal.  As with other sorts of addicts, the afflicted seek to deflect responsibility away from themselves by blaming others and attempting to undermine the authority and qualifications of the researchers and doctors who spend their lives understanding the illness and prescribing cures. That’s why all the talking points of the anti-environment, anti-government, pro-business as usual crowd slam academia and scientific experts.

“Cigarettes won’t hurt me, that’s just something the government says so that they can increase the tobacco tax.”

“There ain’t no global warming!”

“Drill Baby Drill!”

(btw – Just because they are sick, doesn’t mean that they are not also morons.)

So with no further ado, here is an almost two-year-old piece that you can plug the BP oil well failure, diversion of Great Lakes Water, and the Asian Carp time-bomb into in all the appropriate places, it still rings true.


I‘ve been fuming for a good while now about the state of the global ecology, and how it’s been like watching a train wreck film one frame at a time.

No, that’s not quite accurate.

It’s been like being the psychic in a crime drama who really does see what is going to happen next, but no one listens because everyone thinks that you are crazy. You know what is going to happen, but there isn’t anything you can do to stop it. And I’m not the only one who feels this way. There have been thousands of writers, professors, research scientists, reporters, resource managers, parents, gardeners, even economists and other real-life psychics trying to point out that a crash is about to happen only to be given a condescending look and told that we shouldn’t worry, the professionals are in control of the situation. And we should take our medicine more regularly.

And so I’ve been doing some fence sitting of late trying to decide whether to say anything or not, and have decided that I really must point out that

We Fucking Told You!

By “We” I mean the folks with a basic environmental education and a comprehension of some simple ecological principles like, “Don’t fill your bed with poop.” The folks who have been called tree-huggers, eco-nazis, granola bars, Woodsy the Owl, wacko, and worse by proponents of unbridled growth and industrialization. You know, “Free Market” types.

I’m not going to use any political labels, they tend to have a lot of gray area anyway, but we all know who you are. The men and women who pursue short term gain without thought of how the pursuit will impact things down the line not just for you, but for the community as a whole. The men and women who think that the future will take care of itself and that technology can figure out how to fix whatever you break before the shit hits the fan.

You aren’t going to invest in the research or implementation of said technology. That’s someone else’s job. And it better not be funded with YOUR tax dollars. The government is the problem here, not you. All the government wants to do is tax you, limit your freedom to do as you damn well please, and leave early on Fridays.

But when the aforementioned fecal matter does contact the rapidly revolving air circulation device, who you gonna call? Well, you probably won’t call anybody because you will be laying low hoping no one notices how badly you fucked-up, but we all know that the government is gonna get involved in cleaning up your mess somewhere down the line.

When the government has to clean-up after you it suddenly doesn’t seem like such a bad idea for them to pay for the job with those tax dollars we were talking about earlier, does it? Never mind that the money comes from all of us taxpayers collectively, this is a bigger issue, your sorry ass needs saving! It may be a government agency doing the work, or it may be one of the various regulatory agencies forcing you to either clean up your own mess or pay someone else to do it. The issue may end up in one of the government courthouses to be sorted out, and God willing, someone may have to spend some time in jail (another government institution) thinking about what they have done. (Not that it will help correct your attitude, but it will help the rest of us feel better about the whole thing.)

This is all bass ackwards, but it’s been SOP for as long as any of us can remember. There has always been the belief, at least in our Western tradition (Western civilization, not the old west), that there is enough elasticity in the global system to permit us to recover from whatever stupidity we inflict upon the world. We will never run out of resources, we just need to keep looking around and we’ll find what we want/need.

Hot, Flat, and Crowded , by Thomas L. Friedman (Published by Farrar, Straus & Giroux, 2008) is a good explanation of why that model was wrong, and explains that we don’t have all that much play in the global ecology or economy any longer. Mr. Friedman, Foreign Affairs Columnist for the New York Times (a title that probably sounds juicier than it really is) has obviously done his homework for this book, and I hope that it gets read, and more importantly understood, by the right people.

However, (and this is the exasperating part) the basic premise of the book has been around for ages! We live in a closed and finite system. (Think really big aquarium.) All of our actions have consequences, many of which can be predicted and avoided. You don’t even have to resort to math in most instances, its all been worked out for you. You just need to do your homework, or hire someone who did their homework, and plug the variables into your business plan. You need to create another heading for “environmental impacts.” There may be none, but you need to ask the questions and plan how you will handle any impacts that you cause. Yes, it may well increase costs. And so does cleaning the place periodically, repairing stuff that breaks or wears out, and taking out the trash.

The problem is that greed and arrogance cause lots of people to think that the fundamental truths of the universe won’t apply in their instance, or they just don’t care so long as they get theirs. There is also the problem of ignorance of the ramifications of their actions to take into account. But why is ignorance of natural laws an excuse when it isn’t for any cultural laws? Break banking laws and you are in deep shit. Deplete or compromise our life support system and no one bats an eye. At least they didn’t until very recently.

Just this week no less a giant of our national economy than Alan Greenspan conceded that the free market approach in banking screwed the pooch. He’s said before that the US has “abandoned the notion that we should leave crises to be resolved solely by the marketplace,”. Now the markets are less free and banks, insurance companies, and mortgages are being socialized. (In a neo-con administration, no less!) I want to emphasize that this happened in the financial sector, one of the most scrutinized, traditionally conservative industries on the planet. Millions of individual fortunes and billions of lives have been adversely effected world-wide by this failure to protect the common good. Now world leaders are scrambling to clean up the mess and are spending unbelievable sums of money to do it. We need those leaders to realize that the banking crisis, huge as it may be, is dwarfed by the ecological crisis we are now in.

It is my greatest hope that the next administration steps up to the plate for our global environment and makes it a priority to require government, business and industry to exercise the same level of diligence in environmental matters as are required in fiscal matters, and that congress has the stones to fund the necessary enforcement and remediation. Because as we all have been so forcefully reminded, without enforcement there is no accountability beyond the next fiscal quarter. And while living through a deep recession sucks, the economy will correct in several years. If we allow the global environment to break down, correction will only happen in the fullness of geologic time.

As Thoreau said over a hundred years ago,

What good is a fine house if you don’t have a tolerable planet to put it on?

JP
EvernoteGoogle ReaderGoogle GmailDeliciousShare

Ya wanna make a bet?

Tuesday, May 25th, 2010

Over at the BBC, Richard Black reports that bookies are taking bets on which Gulf of Mexico species will be the first to go extinct as a result of BP’s oil well catastrophe, and how doing so may lead to greater environmental awareness in non-environmentally aware populations.  He goes on to discuss just how many people that group includes, and how hard it is to get our message out to people who aren’t currently on the bandwagon, whatever our message is.

What do you think?  Is this a novel concept for raising awareness of, or heartless profiteering on, a natural disaster?

Brian

###

EvernoteGoogle ReaderGoogle GmailDeliciousShare

Mr. Carp goes to Washington

Wednesday, February 10th, 2010

Rep. James Oberstar (D – MN8) did a nice job of chairing a hearing of the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure on the Asian Carp problem the Great Lakes faces.  It was the first time I have watched a webcast of a Congressional hearing, and I have to say I liked it a lot better than I thought I would.  I’ve worked in state, local and county government, and lobbied state legislatures, so this had a pretty familiar feel.

There were the elected officials being sufficiently non-committal (regardless of what they really thought) to encourage the panel of speakers.  The administration’s man, Cameron Davis, (late of the Alliance for the Great Lakes, now the EPA Great Lakes Czar) was holding up the framework from the Carp Summit the day before and politely pointing out that he had been trying to get action on the Carp issue for 5 years or so, but assuring everyone that the administration had the bit in their teeth and were now on the right track.  The guy from the Army Corps in full dress uniform assuring all assembled that they are studying the hell out of the situation, just like they were directed to do, and that their existing projects were really important and everyone should back off and let them engineer stuff.  Everyone else was predictable as well.  I want to congratulate Michigan DNRE Director Humphries for being very cordial, well spoken & sticking to her guns, insisting that the lakes must be physically separated from the Mississippi drainage permanently.  Period.  Another stand-out was Professor Lodge from Notre Dame, the guy who has been developing the eDNA techniques that let us know where fish have been even if we can’t find the fish (which, as any fisherman will tell you, happens more than we care to admit).  He appeared to be a careful academic, and chose his words carefully in answering questions, even though you could tell that he wanted to say something like, “Just fill the damn canal in, will ya?”

Rep. Oberstar runs a good hearing.  He was even-handed and was respectful to everyone there, even thanking them several times for braving the east coast blizzard and the likely-hood of being stranded in town for a while.

My favorite part of the whole affair was when Chairman Oberstar drew a parallel between the environmental and human suffering that was inflicted on New Orleans by the MRGO canal, which also only sees very light and easily re-routed shipping traffic, to the CSSC, and asked the USACE officer if he couldn’t see closing the Chicago canals as being as beneficial as the closing of MRGO .  The USACE officer completely avoided answering the question but talked instead of the complexity of the engineering issues involved in Chicago and ways that they might regulate the locks differently, but not necessarily better.  I got the impression that it hurt the Corps feelings to be told to shut down MRGO, and they don’t want to close another cool, old, canal just because it has some problems that they can engineer more solutions for, if we give them more money.  Unfortunately, the most recent plan to put $78 million into band-aids won’t fix the problem, and there is still no permanent solution to the trans-basin migration of invasive alien species.

The Army Corps reminds me of a gear-head neighbor I used to have.  He didn’t have lots of money, but he loved tinkering on old cars just to prove that he could make them run again, if only for a short time.  This wasn’t Jay Leno pouring all the money needed into a project car to restore it to better-than-new condition.  He would fix one thing only to find another problem.  But he kept at it, because that’s what he liked to do.  At one point his wife told me that his hobby was, “Buying old, junk cars and working on them until he had to pay someone to haul them away.”   It was dirty, smelly, and loud work carried on in and around his garage.  The projects would sit around for months with no discernible progress being made.  The neighbors all grumbled.  But at least  it was his place and his money.

The Corps, on the other hand,  isn’t playing with their own land & money, but ours.  It’s time they were told that their canal and diversion projects at the south end of Lake Michigan need to go because they’re an eyesore, are creating a public nuisance, and are a health hazard.  As Chicago’s neighbors on the lake, we need to put our foot down and not let the tiny bit of out-dated commerce created by these dinosaurs ruin our property values.  And Chicago needs to clean-up their sewage like the rest of us and put the water back where they found it in no worse shape than when they borrowed it.  This won’t just benefit the Great Lakes, but the waterways and communities downstream from Chicago all the way to and including the Gulf of Mexico who are now getting, literally, shit upon.  You’d think that not having 2 billion gallons of water a day flowing down the river might help with downstream flooding a little as well, wouldn’t you?

What is complicated about getting a big suction dredge to the south end of the lake and filling the places where Lake Michigan leaks out with sand?  There are only about 6 of them from Burns Harbor, IN  to north of Chicago.  They could do it in a couple months, tops.  Then we would have a permanent physical separation of the Mississippi and Great Lakes drainages with no easy way for invasive alien species to cross from one to the other.

Just like it was before 19th Century Chicagoans “improved” it by building the canal in the first place.

EvernoteGoogle ReaderGoogle GmailDeliciousShare
Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes
Proudly using Dynamic Headers by Nicasio WordPress Design