Great Lakes

...now browsing by tag

 
 

Hot, Dry July

Tuesday, August 2nd, 2011

Global warming will have serious effects on the Great Lakes.  We rely on abundant water and cooler summer temperatures to keep the regional ecology stable and healthy, and for our giant tourism industry.

With only a half inch of rain recorded for all of July; a departure of 2.7-inches below normal precipitation amounts, Gaylord experienced the driest July on record, beating out 1965.

“That’s been 40 days since we’ve had a significant amount of rainfall,” said Halblaub.

Adding insult to injury for those who enjoy their weather on the normal side Gaylord’s July temperatures topped out at 71.2 degrees, 3.7 degrees above the mean normal average of 67.5 degrees. According to Halblaub the month tied for third with 1983 as the hottest July on record.

Source: The Gaylord (Michigan) Herald Times

EvernoteGoogle ReaderGoogle GmailDeliciousShare

The Spirit of the Lakes

Sunday, July 24th, 2011

Everyone who has spent time on and around the Great Lakes knows that they each have very  different personalities, and I believe that they each have that quality I call Spirit of Place.  You probably know exactly what I’m talking about if you’ve ever had a favorite or secret spot where you return again and again to seek peace and renewal.

The lakes’ personalities aren’t fixed, either.  They change with the weather, much like ours do.  Lake Michigan on a sunny summer day  is bright, alive, friendly and playful as a Golden Retriever puppy.  In the depths of winter she seems to be in hibernation unless she is awoken by a storm, then she is fierce and angry.  Lake Superior is more aloof and almost never as playful as Michigan, and she is awesome and terrifying in her storm persona.

I grew to really like the lakes from playing on the beaches of Michigan, Superior and Huron as a kid and young adult.  I grew to love them from sitting on the shore, in a cottage, car or tent staring out at their fury in a storm.  Watching a big storm build as it blows in across one of the Great Lakes reminds me of Wagnerian operas, only better because I know that here is the real deal, nature uncontrollable and raw; not someone’s interpretation of a great storm.  You would be no different out there than a wind-blown leaf, and you’d last about as long.  Again, Superior in storm is breathtaking and awe inspiring.  I never feel as small, helpless and insignificant as when watching Lake Superior go wild.  But there is a soul cleansing quality there as well.  Just as the storm cleans the air and the shore, it leaves me feeling refreshed and eager to get outside and enjoy that feeling that comes right after a storm and only lasts for an hour or so.

Have you fallen in love with the spirit of one of the Great Lakes?  When and how did it happen?

EvernoteGoogle ReaderGoogle GmailDeliciousShare

Water = Life (or maybe just some more natural gas)

Friday, July 22nd, 2011

It’s almost impossible in any discussion of fresh water resources not to run up against what by now should be an obvious fact; our Earth is a closed system, so the same water that was here millions of years ago is still here now, it just keeps getting recycled through the water cycle we all remember from grade school science class.  The revelation Will Rogers famously had about land also holds true for water, “They ain’t making any more of the stuff.”

Water is known as a “flow resource” due to this ability for the same mineral to be recycled and used over and over again.

Flow resources are resources that are not permanently expendable under usual circumstances; they are resources which are replaced. They are commonly expressed in annual rates at which they are regenerated. Examples are fresh-water runoff and timber. Stock resources can be permanently expended and whose quantity is usually expressed in absolute amounts rather than in rates. Examples are coal and petroleum deposits.  From Ecology Dictionary

This definition ceases to be true for water in unusual circumstances, say when it is used for commercial purposes and then injected deep within the Earth’s crust rather than getting cleaned up and put back in the system.  Unusual use of this sort, which nature hasn’t had to deal with up until now, effectively takes our most precious, valuable-to-life, recyclable, flow resource and makes it a stock resource.  This is a particularly troubling development because life on earth is possible only due to the happy accident that we have the right amount of liquid, available water in the system.  Much more water and we’d all have fins.  Much less and most of us wouldn’t be here at all.

With the explosion of the human population, global deforestation, global climate change, the industrialization of large, once third-world countries like China and India, and the associated increased demand we are making on our planet’s water we are headed toward a future where water will become so coveted and rare that we will go to war over it.  (Call it blood water.)  We simply cannot afford to squander water any longer.

As a brief historical aside, early in the development of oil and gas as energy sources it was common practice to “flare off” or burn the gas so you could get the oil out of the ground without getting blown-up.  The practice is illegal in most areas today except during exploration, before a pipeline is completed to transport the gas,  or at sea where no other way of dealing with it is available.*  At the time they didn’t realize that they were squandering what would become a very valuable commodity and contributing to the concentration of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.  Today we think, “Morons.”  *From The Dictionary of Petroleum Exploration by Norman J. Hyne.

Speaking of oil and gas production, it is fast becoming the biggest user of water as a stock resource through a process called Hydraulic Fracturing, Hydro Fracking, or just Fracking.  Briefly, hydro fracking drills a hole down into the gas bearing rock, and then at right angles to the rock layers.  Then millions of gallons of water mixed with a proprietary, toxic witch’s brew of chemicals and sand are pumped into the holes under enormous pressure to fracture the rock strata, releasing natural gas trapped in small pockets within the rock.   (Oh, and sometimes the gas or fracking fluid gets into the local aquifer and poisons it.)

Here is a YouTube video that shows the process generically.

Once this is done the millions of gallons of badly polluted water are pumped out of the well and hauled away to be deep well injected, never to be used again for drinking, watering the garden or crops, as a home for fish, for outdoor recreation, rain, snow or fog.  It is locked away forever deep within the earth because it can’t be treated with current water treatment facilities, and the oil and gas industry and our government(s) have determined that it just isn’t cost effective to make drillers develop the tech to treat the water so that it can be reused.  (Remember when we used that excuse for municipal and industrial sewage until we killed one of the Great Lakes and our rivers were catching on fire?  And as to the wisdom of burying toxic wastes to get rid of them, Google “Love Canal.”  No, it isn’t porn, but it is disgusting.)

Economics has historically had a hard time putting a value on ecosystem services and flow resources because of the fact that commonly used market models don’t work so well for them.  But economists are pretty good at valuing stock resources like oil and natural gas.  I would like to propose that we start demanding that our governments do the work to figure out what the cost for an eternally wasted gallon of water is in terms of lost value to our ecosystems, and add that to the value it has to oil and gas drillers as a fracking fluid, and start charging oil and gas companies for our water that they are removing from the global ecosystem forever.  And the cost needs to be a steep one, not a token, with the goal being to charge such a high price that treating water so that it is able to be safely released back into the environment becomes economically attractive, not to get in the water selling business.  Just make the price of a barrel of water used for fracking the current price of a barrel of West Texas Intermediate crude oil.  A better solution still would be to demand a complete ban on fracking until such time as the treatment facilities to deal with the insane volumes of water involved are in place.

Unfortunately, I don’t think that we have the public support to accomplish either of these solutions today.  The discussion on fracking has been centered on the toxic soup fracking fluid becomes, not the scandalous misuse of the foundation of life on Earth.  We can’t live without LOTS of clean, fresh water.  We can’t make new water.  Global warming scenarios predict that Great Lakes summers will be hotter and drier.  And we are letting corporations permanently destroy our water to produce energy for their financial gain?  Pardon the vernacular, but “WTF!?”  In what universe does this make any kind of sense?

If T. Boone Pickens is willing to invest $100 million in fresh water to sell it later to water utilities in cities, and believes that water is going to be the new oil, I think we should listen-up and quit giving away the thing upon which all life depends.  Right now oil and gas companies are buying up water rights in the west so that they can use the water at their discretion.  On our side of the Mississippi we don’t have the same water laws, and so we are trying to limit water withdrawals by all industries with very scientific models, which are being challenged by some of our state legislatures and ignored by some in our governor’s mansions.

Even if the water withdrawal limits are adhered to (they won’t be), they don’t adequately take into account the cumulative effect of permanently removing hundreds of millions of gallons of water from the system forever, as fracking and a few other industries are doing.  It is like the miracle of compounded interest, only we are paying it.

And the cost we are being asked to pay is too dear to to be allowed to continue another day.

 What do you think? Tell us by leaving a comment below.

The Round River has been covering the fracking debate for a while.  Search our archives for more articles on this subject.

EvernoteGoogle ReaderGoogle GmailDeliciousShare

Cousin Eddie goes to Washington (and Lansing, Madison, Columbus, ….)

Monday, July 18th, 2011

Takin' care of business, Cousin Eddie style.

National Lampoon’s “Vacation” series from Warner Brothers Pictures is vintage comedy that only National Lampoon could create.*   Perhaps the best (certainly the most memorable) caricature in the Vacation saga is   Cousin Eddie Johnson (played by Randy Quaid), a big, loveable, rough, simple, uncultured, unlucky bastard who bungles his way through life blissfully unaware that he is unaware of anything.  In Christmas Vacation ** Cousin Eddie arrives unannounced at the Griswold’s suburban home in a vintage (okay, old, beat up) motorhome, and comedy ensues.  Early on Christmas morning Chevy Chase’s character, Clark Griswold, steps out to get the paper and is soon joined on the front porch by his lovely wife Ellen, played by Beverly D’Angelo.

Ellen: What are you looking at?
Clark: Oh, the silent majesty of a winter’s morn… the clean, cool chill of the holiday air… an asshole in his bathrobe, emptying a chemical toilet into my sewer…
[Eddie, in the driveway, is draining the RV's toilet]
Eddie: Shitter was full.
Clark: Ah, yeah. You checked our shitters, honey?
Ellen: Clark, please. He doesn’t know any better.
Clark: He oughta know it’s illegal. That’s a storm sewer. If it fills with gas, I pity the person who lights a match within ten yards of it.

Classic!  Hilarious!

Who’s got the remote?  Fast forward 21 years.

In 2010 Cousin Eddie has become just a little bitter.  He’s become convinced by the boys he drinks beers with, Rush Limbaugh, and Fox News that a bunch of “over-educated idiots” somehow ended up running things.  Their thinking is that these eggheads have implemented a bunch of stupid rules and laws based on “science” that are really just designed to keep him and people like him down, over-tax Real Americans, kill business, and to teach his kids and grand-kids to be liberal eggheads, too.

So Eddie joins the Tea Party, a group of people just like him (except for all the oil millionaires, Wall Street Bankers, Fortune 500 CEOs, and the like.) to fight for the Founding Father’s Ideals – like lowering taxes in order to starve the evil federal government, privatizing education, breaking unions, relaxing regulations for the banking, energy and manufacturing sectors and instead relying on the honorable men and women in these industries practicing “personal responsibility” and “doing the right thing.”  These are all principles that Eddie has supported his entire life, he just needed Rupert Murdoch to come along and point that out to him.

Not only did Eddie join the Tea Party, they convinced him he was just the man to run for public office in these dark times, bankrolled his campaign, and he got his-self elected to public office!  Actually, a whole bunch of Eddies got elected to state and federal office in 2010.  At first they were worried that writing legislation would be a lot like homework, but to their happy surprise they found that they can just copy legislation already written by the smart people at the American Legislative Exchange Council, or ALEC.  (Hey!  Whata ya know?  It IS just like homework!)

The Nation’s John Nichols writes in a piece called “ALEC Exposed“,

Founded in 1973 by Paul Weyrich and other conservative activists frustrated by recent electoral setbacks, ALEC is a critical arm of the right-wing network of policy shops that, with infusions of corporate cash, has evolved to shape American politics. Inspired by Milton Friedman’s call for conservatives to “develop alternatives to existing policies [and] keep them alive and available,” ALEC’s model legislation reflects long-term goals: downsizing government, removing regulations on corporations and making it harder to hold the economically and politically powerful to account. Corporate donors retain veto power over the language, which is developed by the secretive task forces. The task forces cover issues from education to health policy. ALEC’s priorities for the 2011 session included bills to privatize education, break unions, deregulate major industries, pass voter ID laws and more. In states across the country they succeeded, with stacks of new laws signed by GOP governors like Ohio’s John Kasich and Wisconsin’s Scott Walker, both ALEC alums.

Among the primary targets of the new Eddies in Michigan and at the federal level is removing cumbersome environmental regulations that slow the speed of development and new construction or major renovation for roads, factories, mines, oil and gas wells, pipelines, and other power transmission corridors.

However,  The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), The Clean Air Act of 1970 (CAA), and the Clean Water Act of 1972 (CWA) were all adopted, in large part, to slow the speed of new construction or major renovation for roads, factories, mines, oil and gas wells, pipelines, and other power transmission corridors!  That was one of the primary  goals of environmental regulation.  To turn off the bulldozers and  provide adequate  time for regulators, concerned citizens, neighbors, and other interested parties to comment and study the potential impacts – both planned and unforeseen – of the proposed work in a logical, organized way so that a sound recommendation could be made to permitting entities and political units BEFORE the whatsit is built.  These laws were passed after the Love Canal toxic waste dump was exposed, the Santa Barbara oil spill was daily TV for weeks in 1969,  Lake Erie was declared dead, some rivers caught on fire (including Detroit’s Rouge River),  and our national symbol nearly became extinct in the lower 48.  These events and more like them made it pretty clear to nearly all Americans that if we left environmental review and enforcement up to the individual states, local political pressure would trump the common good and the situation would continue status quo.

Just for fun, here’s a quote from Fred L. Hartley, then president of the Union Oil Co., who owned and operated the well that blew-out off of the California coast coating miles of California beaches with tar and killing seals, dolphins, whales, birds, and assorted marine life.

“I don’t like to call it a disaster, because there has been no loss of human life.  I am amazed at the publicity for the loss of a few birds.” 

Isn’t that cute?  But it is illustrative of the mind set then.  There was man, and there was nature.  If nature got in man’s way, nature had to go.  Unfortunately, “They’re baaack!”

Right now a very worrisome series of events are taking place, seemingly in concert.  These include the US House of Representatives passing H.R. 2018 – The Clean Water Cooperative Federalism Act of 2011, by a 239-184 vote.  (Just 16 Democrats supported the bill, and only 13 Republicans voted against it.)  H.R. 2018 would gut the Clean Water Act and, as the EPA said in their analysis of H.R. 2018, “The bill would overturn almost 40 years of Federal legislation by preventing EPA from protecting public health and water quality.”  You can read the details yourself in the Library of Congress site on-line here.

In Michigan Senate Bill 272 was passed along party lines in May.  If this becomes law it would require, in part, that no state rule shall be more stringent than an applicable federal rule, and that agencies adopting rules that might cost small business money should exempt small businesses from the rule.  Does this mean that if a giant corporation wanted to get rid of a thousand drums of toxic sludge it could farm the job out to a small business who could then just pour the drums out into a stream, because as a small business they are not regulated?

Yeah, I don’t know either.

The combined impact of these laws would be disastrous for Michigan and the Great Lakes.  If the federal EPA is not allowed to enforce the CWA or force states to do so, and the state agencies in Michigan are prohibited from doing anything more stringent than that, what happens to the people and natural resources of Michigan and the entire Great Lakes region?

If the Eddies get their way, we’re all headed back to 1969.

                                   

* “Lampoon” as a verb means to ridicule or make fun of, and is the opposite of “applaud,” approve,” praise” or “support. ” As a noun it means parody or satire, both of which require that you have to start with something real that we understand in order for the lampoon to work.  (See Swift, JonatonA Modest Proposal)

** Christmas Vacation.  Dir. Jeremiah S. Chechik. Perf. Chevy Chase, Beverly D’Angelo and Randy Quaid. Warner Bros. Pictures, 1989.

EvernoteGoogle ReaderGoogle GmailDeliciousShare

Great Lakes Restoration Initiative Feedback

Tuesday, August 31st, 2010

Here are my recommendations to the GLRI folks.  You can give them your ideas at http://greatlakesrestoration.us

  • Construct wetlands to filter run-off and address water quality issues from urban and agricultural areas.  Use remediated brownfield sites where possible.
  • Develop and implement a comprehensive restoration plan for coaster brook trout throughout their historical range (not just Lake Superior).
  • Thoroughly regulate the practice of Hydraulic Fracturing in minerals extraction to eliminate both water quality and withdraw quantity issues, and to protect the public’s health, safety and property.
  • Work to prohibit metallic sulfide mining near waters tributary to the great lakes.  The lakes have no buffering capabilities and leachate washing into the lakes will have devastating effects.
  • Develop ballast water discharge and invasive species regulations with real teeth. Develop comprehensive control and eradication plans for invasive alien species in the great lakes.  Yes this is a huge job and will cost well into the billions of dollars.  Shoulda regulated ballast water and planned for invasion through the Welland canal.  Too late to go back and do that, and we do not accept “Woops!”  as an acceptable response.  RESTORE the lakes.  Don’t just work on them, FIX THEM!

I don’t know if anybody is going to read these things, or if they are like the old cartoon of the office suggestion box with a pretty sign and mail-slot on one side of the wall and a paper shredder on the other.

It is such a joke that they are making all this hoopla about a couple hundred million dollars when the task will run into the hundreds of BILLIONS at the least.  (Too bad the Great Lakes aren’t as important as Iraq to the well being of our nation, eh?)

If the federal government were a dog owner and the Lakes their dog, it would be as if they refused to feed us or take us to the vet, let us suffer with poisonings and parasites of all kinds, kicked us whenever they felt like it, and let their friends treat us as poorly as they pleased.  Then they throw us a Milk Bone from time to time and expect us to be satisfied and the ASPCA to leave them alone.

What jerks.

EvernoteGoogle ReaderGoogle GmailDeliciousShare

Carp Hearing Today @ 3:30 EST

Wednesday, July 14th, 2010

Mail from Senator Debbie Stabenow

United States Senator Debbie Stabenow - Michigan
Dear Brian,

Two weeks ago, I wrote to you about new legislation I authored to permanently separate the Mississippi River system and the Great Lakes, to keep out Asian carp and other invasive species. This afternoon, as Chair of the Water and Power Subcommittee, I will be holding a hearing to make sure the federal government is doing everything in its power to address the threat of Asian carp.

The hearing will begin at 3:30pm and can be watched live online. To watch, click here: http://stabenow.senate.gov/carphearing. Testifying today before the Subcommittee will be:

The Honorable Nancy Sutley, White House Council on Environmental Quality

Dr. Leon Carl, United States Geological Survey

Mr. John Rogner, Illinois Department of Natural Resources

Mr. Tim Eder, Great Lakes Commission

From the beginning of this threat, Michigan’s Congressional delegation has been working closely together, across party lines, in a unified effort to stop the spread of Asian carp. I will continue working with my colleagues to protect Michigan and our Great Lakes.

Sincerely,

Debbie Stabenow

United States Senator

U.S. Senator Debbie Stabenow
The United States Senate • Washington, DC 20510
stabenow.senate.gov

EvernoteGoogle ReaderGoogle GmailDeliciousShare

Breaking Up Is Hard To Do!

Wednesday, June 30th, 2010

There is new legislation in Congress to push the Army Corps to engineer a permanent physical separation of the Mississippi River drainage and the Great Lakes at Chicago, reversing over 100 years of  diversion of Lake Michigan water out of the Great Lakes watershed and closing the door on invasive species, like the Asian carp, trying to enter the Lakes.  I’ve written on this several times, and a good general description of the problem is Carp Wars.

In an e-mail today Senator Debbie Stabenow writes:

Dear Brian,

I am writing to give you an update on my work to protect the Great Lakes from Asian carp. The recent discovery of an Asian carp in Lake Calumet, very close to Lake Michigan, should serve as a wake-up call to government agencies about the urgency of this situation.

Today, I introduced legislation to permanently prevent Asian carp and other invasive species from entering the Great Lakes. Congressman Dave Camp (R-Michigan) has introduced our bipartisan legislation in the House of Representatives as well. The Permanent Prevention of Asian Carp Act requires the Army Corps of Engineers to follow the recommendations of top experts in the field and expedite their study detailing the engineering options to permanently separate the Mississippi River from the Great Lakes.

In the Senate, my bill is co-sponsored by Senator Dick Durbin (D-Illinois), Senator Carl Levin (D-Michigan), and other Great Lakes Senators. A permanent separation of the waterways would allow cargo to pass through the Chicago locks, but would prevent the water itself, and any invasive species living in it, from entering Lake Michigan.

I also recently spoke about this issue on the floor of the Senate, so my colleagues would know how urgent this issue is for us in Michigan. You can watch the speech on YouTube at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QY-Sy12t3qg.

The Great Lakes are Michigan’s most precious natural resource, and they are a part of our way of life. I will never stop fighting to protect them.

Sincerely,

Debbie Stabenow

United States Senator

Now where this goes, or how much support we can expect from the Chicago-friendly White House, is anybody’s guess.  But its a great effort, and I would encourage everyone to contact their Congress-person or Senator and encourage them to support this bill.  An e-mail or phone call to the White House wouldn’t hurt either.

Does it strike anyone else as wrong that we continuously have to fight Washington to step-up and do what is right for public health and the welfare of our shared environment?  Shouldn’t that be the default response?

###

EvernoteGoogle ReaderGoogle GmailDeliciousShare

I Was Green When Green Wasn’t Cool!

Monday, May 31st, 2010

With apologies to Barbara Mandrell

*I wrote this originally in October of 2008, before we knew the outcome of the election, the extent of this recession, that Copenhagen would fizzle (shoulda seen that one coming) and that many of the suppositions made in “Hot, Flat, etc.” would be put in storage because there wasn’t any damn money to fuel the consumerism engine.  They haven’t been proven wrong, however.  They are just hibernating, waiting for the rainy season to return.

Obviously, I am still waiting for the Obama administration to step up.

And now we have this unbelievably horrible oil well run amok in the Gulf of Mexico, (which anyone with more brains than Sarah Palin knew would happen eventually); corporations and communities are looking at Great Lakes water with impure thoughts and intent; and the Asian Carp Spill is just waiting to happen in the Chicago Sanitary Canal, a spill of biological pollution that will kill the Great Lakes as surely as the BP oil debacle is killing marine and estuarine food chains out in the Gulf of Mexico.

We nattering naybobs have been trying to point out that environmental oversight is a pretty good use of the federal government, and we should insist that that work happen in an unhurried, non-biased way.

But we’re a nation of addicts, and we don’t care if the trash gets carried out, the dishes washed, or the baby’s diaper gets changed as long as we don’t run out of oil.  You won’t hear that coming from the Oil Cartels because they only want to make money, and addicts are a crucial part of their business plan. You won’t hear that coming from the majority of politicians, because addicts are the best liars on earth.  They lie so convincingly that they have fooled themselves into believing that everything is just fine and normal.  But even the most casual observer sees things are neither fine nor normal.  As with other sorts of addicts, the afflicted seek to deflect responsibility away from themselves by blaming others and attempting to undermine the authority and qualifications of the researchers and doctors who spend their lives understanding the illness and prescribing cures. That’s why all the talking points of the anti-environment, anti-government, pro-business as usual crowd slam academia and scientific experts.

“Cigarettes won’t hurt me, that’s just something the government says so that they can increase the tobacco tax.”

“There ain’t no global warming!”

“Drill Baby Drill!”

(btw – Just because they are sick, doesn’t mean that they are not also morons.)

So with no further ado, here is an almost two-year-old piece that you can plug the BP oil well failure, diversion of Great Lakes Water, and the Asian Carp time-bomb into in all the appropriate places, it still rings true.


I‘ve been fuming for a good while now about the state of the global ecology, and how it’s been like watching a train wreck film one frame at a time.

No, that’s not quite accurate.

It’s been like being the psychic in a crime drama who really does see what is going to happen next, but no one listens because everyone thinks that you are crazy. You know what is going to happen, but there isn’t anything you can do to stop it. And I’m not the only one who feels this way. There have been thousands of writers, professors, research scientists, reporters, resource managers, parents, gardeners, even economists and other real-life psychics trying to point out that a crash is about to happen only to be given a condescending look and told that we shouldn’t worry, the professionals are in control of the situation. And we should take our medicine more regularly.

And so I’ve been doing some fence sitting of late trying to decide whether to say anything or not, and have decided that I really must point out that

We Fucking Told You!

By “We” I mean the folks with a basic environmental education and a comprehension of some simple ecological principles like, “Don’t fill your bed with poop.” The folks who have been called tree-huggers, eco-nazis, granola bars, Woodsy the Owl, wacko, and worse by proponents of unbridled growth and industrialization. You know, “Free Market” types.

I’m not going to use any political labels, they tend to have a lot of gray area anyway, but we all know who you are. The men and women who pursue short term gain without thought of how the pursuit will impact things down the line not just for you, but for the community as a whole. The men and women who think that the future will take care of itself and that technology can figure out how to fix whatever you break before the shit hits the fan.

You aren’t going to invest in the research or implementation of said technology. That’s someone else’s job. And it better not be funded with YOUR tax dollars. The government is the problem here, not you. All the government wants to do is tax you, limit your freedom to do as you damn well please, and leave early on Fridays.

But when the aforementioned fecal matter does contact the rapidly revolving air circulation device, who you gonna call? Well, you probably won’t call anybody because you will be laying low hoping no one notices how badly you fucked-up, but we all know that the government is gonna get involved in cleaning up your mess somewhere down the line.

When the government has to clean-up after you it suddenly doesn’t seem like such a bad idea for them to pay for the job with those tax dollars we were talking about earlier, does it? Never mind that the money comes from all of us taxpayers collectively, this is a bigger issue, your sorry ass needs saving! It may be a government agency doing the work, or it may be one of the various regulatory agencies forcing you to either clean up your own mess or pay someone else to do it. The issue may end up in one of the government courthouses to be sorted out, and God willing, someone may have to spend some time in jail (another government institution) thinking about what they have done. (Not that it will help correct your attitude, but it will help the rest of us feel better about the whole thing.)

This is all bass ackwards, but it’s been SOP for as long as any of us can remember. There has always been the belief, at least in our Western tradition (Western civilization, not the old west), that there is enough elasticity in the global system to permit us to recover from whatever stupidity we inflict upon the world. We will never run out of resources, we just need to keep looking around and we’ll find what we want/need.

Hot, Flat, and Crowded , by Thomas L. Friedman (Published by Farrar, Straus & Giroux, 2008) is a good explanation of why that model was wrong, and explains that we don’t have all that much play in the global ecology or economy any longer. Mr. Friedman, Foreign Affairs Columnist for the New York Times (a title that probably sounds juicier than it really is) has obviously done his homework for this book, and I hope that it gets read, and more importantly understood, by the right people.

However, (and this is the exasperating part) the basic premise of the book has been around for ages! We live in a closed and finite system. (Think really big aquarium.) All of our actions have consequences, many of which can be predicted and avoided. You don’t even have to resort to math in most instances, its all been worked out for you. You just need to do your homework, or hire someone who did their homework, and plug the variables into your business plan. You need to create another heading for “environmental impacts.” There may be none, but you need to ask the questions and plan how you will handle any impacts that you cause. Yes, it may well increase costs. And so does cleaning the place periodically, repairing stuff that breaks or wears out, and taking out the trash.

The problem is that greed and arrogance cause lots of people to think that the fundamental truths of the universe won’t apply in their instance, or they just don’t care so long as they get theirs. There is also the problem of ignorance of the ramifications of their actions to take into account. But why is ignorance of natural laws an excuse when it isn’t for any cultural laws? Break banking laws and you are in deep shit. Deplete or compromise our life support system and no one bats an eye. At least they didn’t until very recently.

Just this week no less a giant of our national economy than Alan Greenspan conceded that the free market approach in banking screwed the pooch. He’s said before that the US has “abandoned the notion that we should leave crises to be resolved solely by the marketplace,”. Now the markets are less free and banks, insurance companies, and mortgages are being socialized. (In a neo-con administration, no less!) I want to emphasize that this happened in the financial sector, one of the most scrutinized, traditionally conservative industries on the planet. Millions of individual fortunes and billions of lives have been adversely effected world-wide by this failure to protect the common good. Now world leaders are scrambling to clean up the mess and are spending unbelievable sums of money to do it. We need those leaders to realize that the banking crisis, huge as it may be, is dwarfed by the ecological crisis we are now in.

It is my greatest hope that the next administration steps up to the plate for our global environment and makes it a priority to require government, business and industry to exercise the same level of diligence in environmental matters as are required in fiscal matters, and that congress has the stones to fund the necessary enforcement and remediation. Because as we all have been so forcefully reminded, without enforcement there is no accountability beyond the next fiscal quarter. And while living through a deep recession sucks, the economy will correct in several years. If we allow the global environment to break down, correction will only happen in the fullness of geologic time.

As Thoreau said over a hundred years ago,

What good is a fine house if you don’t have a tolerable planet to put it on?

JP
EvernoteGoogle ReaderGoogle GmailDeliciousShare

“You can’t always get what you want.”

Monday, May 17th, 2010

To paraphrase Sir Mick,

You can’t always get what you want.
But if you try sometime, you just might find,
You get what you measure.

If you are going to change something, build something, or fix something it sure helps if at the beginning of the enterprise you have a good idea of what the desired outcome is beyond simply different or “better.”  Today we commonly refer to these as “metrics,” (we’ve never used them since the Carter administration, might as well recycle the word.)  These are measurable benchmarks that let you know how your effort is going, and they don’t have to be fancy or esoteric.

However, “TBD” (to be determined), “Unknown,” and “XXX” aren’t really good metrics, and in the case of the most recent draft I have read of the The Great Lakes Multi-year Restoration Action Plan suggest to me that there was either not a consensus or not enough resources were brought to bear on the problem.  It could also be that the metrics were developed but the authors felt silly writing them down, or didn’t want to appear greedy, or knew that it wouldn’t fly with their bosses.  I don’t know.

I do know that unless you have quantifiable goals (Dang!  I’m sounding like an engineer.  That scares me!) and a road map for achieving those goals you are going to waste time and money just tinkering.  Any success is going to be fortuitous.  We don’t have the time or money to rely on fortune, because there is any number of problems in view now and just over the horizon that keep putting us further behind environmentally.  There is no shortage of plans for commercial and municipal uses for the Great Lakes’ resources and there needs to be a well designed (and well funded) solution for answering each of these.

It is easy to pay lip service to Great Lakes restoration.  But without adequate money and human resources for planning and implementation it will not be successful.  Chesapeake Bay and The Everglades have received a lot more attention and money than the Great Lakes have, and they still have  problems, as  Gary Wilson has pointed out over at The Great Lakes Town Hall.

I was involved in government long enough to understand that one way to diffuse an angry mob is to make a grand promise; based on future revenues.  Then you are “listening to your constituents,” but not really committing to doing anything to stop the wheels of commerce or shine a light on a problem you don’t want to think about.  That the funding is going to remediate an important problem, and will create a gazillion jobs in the process isn’t seen as important.

An example is the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act of 1965,  passed “to stimulate a nationwide action program to assist in preserving, developing, and assuring to all citizens of the United States of present and future generations such quality and quantity of outdoor recreation resources as may be available and are necessary and desirable for individual active participation.”  But there is no requirement to expend funds beyond what congress feels like in a given year.  Its primary source of funding is the off-shore oil revenues collected by MMS, and has an annual funding cap of $900 million, but has only reached that cap twice in 45 years.  Usually, it gets a few bucks and the federal side gets pork barreled and the state side is not worth fighting over.  To date it has provided $3.7 billion, but had it put up the $900 Million annually as originally envisioned by the parks and conservation constituencies it would have provided $40.5 Billion by now.  It isn’t that the outer continental shelf doesn’t provide enough oil revenue to fully fund this program; it’s just that for congress, it isn’t a priority.

So we need the best planning possible, which isn’t going to help without a reliable funding stream. To date we have not seen significant funds being devoted to the Lakes Ecosystem.  We are just handed a few bucks and told that we should, “endeavor to persevere.”

We deserve, and must demand, better.

EvernoteGoogle ReaderGoogle GmailDeliciousShare

Why Illinois isn’t worried about Asian Carp in the Great Lakes

Tuesday, March 16th, 2010

It just dawned on me that we have a sociological divide between the rest of the Great Lakes states (and our Canadian cousins, eh?) and Illinois.  We define our existence by the lakes and our cultures are deeply steeped in their lore and legend. (Well, not so much Indiana or Pennsylvania, but they aren’t being turds right now, are they?)  Illinois just wanted a port on the lakes to haul gravel and scrap metal though, and a lot of water to wash their shit down onto someone else.  They are much more interested in crops & commerce than carps, and would be just as happy if there were no fish in the lakes, they don’t need them.

That may seem sort of harsh, but that’s been their argument right along.  They have consistently couched this as a conflict between Chicago’s paltry amount of water-borne commerce and the desire of the entire population of the rest of the lake states and provinces for a healthy Great Lakes system.  They’ve suggested several non-solutions to eat up the clock and have cast doubt on the science suggesting the lakes may be in danger from a few fish.

So, in honor of our self-serving, obstructionist, Illinois neighbors I propose that we rename the “Bighead Carp” the “Chicago Carp.”  Then when they fuck-up the ecology of the largest freshwater lake system on the planet, everyone will remember who to thank.

But you know, they’d probably like that.  It’d be another way that they could show the world how much clout they have, and how they don’t care what happens outside of Cook and the collar counties.

Rat-bastards.

EvernoteGoogle ReaderGoogle GmailDeliciousShare
Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes
Proudly using Dynamic Headers by Nicasio WordPress Design