Asian Carp

...now browsing by tag

 
 

Carp Hearing Today @ 3:30 EST

Wednesday, July 14th, 2010

Mail from Senator Debbie Stabenow

United States Senator Debbie Stabenow - Michigan
Dear Brian,

Two weeks ago, I wrote to you about new legislation I authored to permanently separate the Mississippi River system and the Great Lakes, to keep out Asian carp and other invasive species. This afternoon, as Chair of the Water and Power Subcommittee, I will be holding a hearing to make sure the federal government is doing everything in its power to address the threat of Asian carp.

The hearing will begin at 3:30pm and can be watched live online. To watch, click here: http://stabenow.senate.gov/carphearing. Testifying today before the Subcommittee will be:

The Honorable Nancy Sutley, White House Council on Environmental Quality

Dr. Leon Carl, United States Geological Survey

Mr. John Rogner, Illinois Department of Natural Resources

Mr. Tim Eder, Great Lakes Commission

From the beginning of this threat, Michigan’s Congressional delegation has been working closely together, across party lines, in a unified effort to stop the spread of Asian carp. I will continue working with my colleagues to protect Michigan and our Great Lakes.

Sincerely,

Debbie Stabenow

United States Senator

U.S. Senator Debbie Stabenow
The United States Senate • Washington, DC 20510
stabenow.senate.gov

EvernoteGoogle ReaderGoogle GmailDeliciousShare

Breaking Up Is Hard To Do!

Wednesday, June 30th, 2010

There is new legislation in Congress to push the Army Corps to engineer a permanent physical separation of the Mississippi River drainage and the Great Lakes at Chicago, reversing over 100 years of  diversion of Lake Michigan water out of the Great Lakes watershed and closing the door on invasive species, like the Asian carp, trying to enter the Lakes.  I’ve written on this several times, and a good general description of the problem is Carp Wars.

In an e-mail today Senator Debbie Stabenow writes:

Dear Brian,

I am writing to give you an update on my work to protect the Great Lakes from Asian carp. The recent discovery of an Asian carp in Lake Calumet, very close to Lake Michigan, should serve as a wake-up call to government agencies about the urgency of this situation.

Today, I introduced legislation to permanently prevent Asian carp and other invasive species from entering the Great Lakes. Congressman Dave Camp (R-Michigan) has introduced our bipartisan legislation in the House of Representatives as well. The Permanent Prevention of Asian Carp Act requires the Army Corps of Engineers to follow the recommendations of top experts in the field and expedite their study detailing the engineering options to permanently separate the Mississippi River from the Great Lakes.

In the Senate, my bill is co-sponsored by Senator Dick Durbin (D-Illinois), Senator Carl Levin (D-Michigan), and other Great Lakes Senators. A permanent separation of the waterways would allow cargo to pass through the Chicago locks, but would prevent the water itself, and any invasive species living in it, from entering Lake Michigan.

I also recently spoke about this issue on the floor of the Senate, so my colleagues would know how urgent this issue is for us in Michigan. You can watch the speech on YouTube at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QY-Sy12t3qg.

The Great Lakes are Michigan’s most precious natural resource, and they are a part of our way of life. I will never stop fighting to protect them.

Sincerely,

Debbie Stabenow

United States Senator

Now where this goes, or how much support we can expect from the Chicago-friendly White House, is anybody’s guess.  But its a great effort, and I would encourage everyone to contact their Congress-person or Senator and encourage them to support this bill.  An e-mail or phone call to the White House wouldn’t hurt either.

Does it strike anyone else as wrong that we continuously have to fight Washington to step-up and do what is right for public health and the welfare of our shared environment?  Shouldn’t that be the default response?

###

EvernoteGoogle ReaderGoogle GmailDeliciousShare

I Was Green When Green Wasn’t Cool!

Monday, May 31st, 2010

With apologies to Barbara Mandrell

*I wrote this originally in October of 2008, before we knew the outcome of the election, the extent of this recession, that Copenhagen would fizzle (shoulda seen that one coming) and that many of the suppositions made in “Hot, Flat, etc.” would be put in storage because there wasn’t any damn money to fuel the consumerism engine.  They haven’t been proven wrong, however.  They are just hibernating, waiting for the rainy season to return.

Obviously, I am still waiting for the Obama administration to step up.

And now we have this unbelievably horrible oil well run amok in the Gulf of Mexico, (which anyone with more brains than Sarah Palin knew would happen eventually); corporations and communities are looking at Great Lakes water with impure thoughts and intent; and the Asian Carp Spill is just waiting to happen in the Chicago Sanitary Canal, a spill of biological pollution that will kill the Great Lakes as surely as the BP oil debacle is killing marine and estuarine food chains out in the Gulf of Mexico.

We nattering naybobs have been trying to point out that environmental oversight is a pretty good use of the federal government, and we should insist that that work happen in an unhurried, non-biased way.

But we’re a nation of addicts, and we don’t care if the trash gets carried out, the dishes washed, or the baby’s diaper gets changed as long as we don’t run out of oil.  You won’t hear that coming from the Oil Cartels because they only want to make money, and addicts are a crucial part of their business plan. You won’t hear that coming from the majority of politicians, because addicts are the best liars on earth.  They lie so convincingly that they have fooled themselves into believing that everything is just fine and normal.  But even the most casual observer sees things are neither fine nor normal.  As with other sorts of addicts, the afflicted seek to deflect responsibility away from themselves by blaming others and attempting to undermine the authority and qualifications of the researchers and doctors who spend their lives understanding the illness and prescribing cures. That’s why all the talking points of the anti-environment, anti-government, pro-business as usual crowd slam academia and scientific experts.

“Cigarettes won’t hurt me, that’s just something the government says so that they can increase the tobacco tax.”

“There ain’t no global warming!”

“Drill Baby Drill!”

(btw – Just because they are sick, doesn’t mean that they are not also morons.)

So with no further ado, here is an almost two-year-old piece that you can plug the BP oil well failure, diversion of Great Lakes Water, and the Asian Carp time-bomb into in all the appropriate places, it still rings true.


I‘ve been fuming for a good while now about the state of the global ecology, and how it’s been like watching a train wreck film one frame at a time.

No, that’s not quite accurate.

It’s been like being the psychic in a crime drama who really does see what is going to happen next, but no one listens because everyone thinks that you are crazy. You know what is going to happen, but there isn’t anything you can do to stop it. And I’m not the only one who feels this way. There have been thousands of writers, professors, research scientists, reporters, resource managers, parents, gardeners, even economists and other real-life psychics trying to point out that a crash is about to happen only to be given a condescending look and told that we shouldn’t worry, the professionals are in control of the situation. And we should take our medicine more regularly.

And so I’ve been doing some fence sitting of late trying to decide whether to say anything or not, and have decided that I really must point out that

We Fucking Told You!

By “We” I mean the folks with a basic environmental education and a comprehension of some simple ecological principles like, “Don’t fill your bed with poop.” The folks who have been called tree-huggers, eco-nazis, granola bars, Woodsy the Owl, wacko, and worse by proponents of unbridled growth and industrialization. You know, “Free Market” types.

I’m not going to use any political labels, they tend to have a lot of gray area anyway, but we all know who you are. The men and women who pursue short term gain without thought of how the pursuit will impact things down the line not just for you, but for the community as a whole. The men and women who think that the future will take care of itself and that technology can figure out how to fix whatever you break before the shit hits the fan.

You aren’t going to invest in the research or implementation of said technology. That’s someone else’s job. And it better not be funded with YOUR tax dollars. The government is the problem here, not you. All the government wants to do is tax you, limit your freedom to do as you damn well please, and leave early on Fridays.

But when the aforementioned fecal matter does contact the rapidly revolving air circulation device, who you gonna call? Well, you probably won’t call anybody because you will be laying low hoping no one notices how badly you fucked-up, but we all know that the government is gonna get involved in cleaning up your mess somewhere down the line.

When the government has to clean-up after you it suddenly doesn’t seem like such a bad idea for them to pay for the job with those tax dollars we were talking about earlier, does it? Never mind that the money comes from all of us taxpayers collectively, this is a bigger issue, your sorry ass needs saving! It may be a government agency doing the work, or it may be one of the various regulatory agencies forcing you to either clean up your own mess or pay someone else to do it. The issue may end up in one of the government courthouses to be sorted out, and God willing, someone may have to spend some time in jail (another government institution) thinking about what they have done. (Not that it will help correct your attitude, but it will help the rest of us feel better about the whole thing.)

This is all bass ackwards, but it’s been SOP for as long as any of us can remember. There has always been the belief, at least in our Western tradition (Western civilization, not the old west), that there is enough elasticity in the global system to permit us to recover from whatever stupidity we inflict upon the world. We will never run out of resources, we just need to keep looking around and we’ll find what we want/need.

Hot, Flat, and Crowded , by Thomas L. Friedman (Published by Farrar, Straus & Giroux, 2008) is a good explanation of why that model was wrong, and explains that we don’t have all that much play in the global ecology or economy any longer. Mr. Friedman, Foreign Affairs Columnist for the New York Times (a title that probably sounds juicier than it really is) has obviously done his homework for this book, and I hope that it gets read, and more importantly understood, by the right people.

However, (and this is the exasperating part) the basic premise of the book has been around for ages! We live in a closed and finite system. (Think really big aquarium.) All of our actions have consequences, many of which can be predicted and avoided. You don’t even have to resort to math in most instances, its all been worked out for you. You just need to do your homework, or hire someone who did their homework, and plug the variables into your business plan. You need to create another heading for “environmental impacts.” There may be none, but you need to ask the questions and plan how you will handle any impacts that you cause. Yes, it may well increase costs. And so does cleaning the place periodically, repairing stuff that breaks or wears out, and taking out the trash.

The problem is that greed and arrogance cause lots of people to think that the fundamental truths of the universe won’t apply in their instance, or they just don’t care so long as they get theirs. There is also the problem of ignorance of the ramifications of their actions to take into account. But why is ignorance of natural laws an excuse when it isn’t for any cultural laws? Break banking laws and you are in deep shit. Deplete or compromise our life support system and no one bats an eye. At least they didn’t until very recently.

Just this week no less a giant of our national economy than Alan Greenspan conceded that the free market approach in banking screwed the pooch. He’s said before that the US has “abandoned the notion that we should leave crises to be resolved solely by the marketplace,”. Now the markets are less free and banks, insurance companies, and mortgages are being socialized. (In a neo-con administration, no less!) I want to emphasize that this happened in the financial sector, one of the most scrutinized, traditionally conservative industries on the planet. Millions of individual fortunes and billions of lives have been adversely effected world-wide by this failure to protect the common good. Now world leaders are scrambling to clean up the mess and are spending unbelievable sums of money to do it. We need those leaders to realize that the banking crisis, huge as it may be, is dwarfed by the ecological crisis we are now in.

It is my greatest hope that the next administration steps up to the plate for our global environment and makes it a priority to require government, business and industry to exercise the same level of diligence in environmental matters as are required in fiscal matters, and that congress has the stones to fund the necessary enforcement and remediation. Because as we all have been so forcefully reminded, without enforcement there is no accountability beyond the next fiscal quarter. And while living through a deep recession sucks, the economy will correct in several years. If we allow the global environment to break down, correction will only happen in the fullness of geologic time.

As Thoreau said over a hundred years ago,

What good is a fine house if you don’t have a tolerable planet to put it on?

JP
EvernoteGoogle ReaderGoogle GmailDeliciousShare

Why Illinois isn’t worried about Asian Carp in the Great Lakes

Tuesday, March 16th, 2010

It just dawned on me that we have a sociological divide between the rest of the Great Lakes states (and our Canadian cousins, eh?) and Illinois.  We define our existence by the lakes and our cultures are deeply steeped in their lore and legend. (Well, not so much Indiana or Pennsylvania, but they aren’t being turds right now, are they?)  Illinois just wanted a port on the lakes to haul gravel and scrap metal though, and a lot of water to wash their shit down onto someone else.  They are much more interested in crops & commerce than carps, and would be just as happy if there were no fish in the lakes, they don’t need them.

That may seem sort of harsh, but that’s been their argument right along.  They have consistently couched this as a conflict between Chicago’s paltry amount of water-borne commerce and the desire of the entire population of the rest of the lake states and provinces for a healthy Great Lakes system.  They’ve suggested several non-solutions to eat up the clock and have cast doubt on the science suggesting the lakes may be in danger from a few fish.

So, in honor of our self-serving, obstructionist, Illinois neighbors I propose that we rename the “Bighead Carp” the “Chicago Carp.”  Then when they fuck-up the ecology of the largest freshwater lake system on the planet, everyone will remember who to thank.

But you know, they’d probably like that.  It’d be another way that they could show the world how much clout they have, and how they don’t care what happens outside of Cook and the collar counties.

Rat-bastards.

EvernoteGoogle ReaderGoogle GmailDeliciousShare

Mr. Carp goes to Washington

Wednesday, February 10th, 2010

Rep. James Oberstar (D – MN8) did a nice job of chairing a hearing of the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure on the Asian Carp problem the Great Lakes faces.  It was the first time I have watched a webcast of a Congressional hearing, and I have to say I liked it a lot better than I thought I would.  I’ve worked in state, local and county government, and lobbied state legislatures, so this had a pretty familiar feel.

There were the elected officials being sufficiently non-committal (regardless of what they really thought) to encourage the panel of speakers.  The administration’s man, Cameron Davis, (late of the Alliance for the Great Lakes, now the EPA Great Lakes Czar) was holding up the framework from the Carp Summit the day before and politely pointing out that he had been trying to get action on the Carp issue for 5 years or so, but assuring everyone that the administration had the bit in their teeth and were now on the right track.  The guy from the Army Corps in full dress uniform assuring all assembled that they are studying the hell out of the situation, just like they were directed to do, and that their existing projects were really important and everyone should back off and let them engineer stuff.  Everyone else was predictable as well.  I want to congratulate Michigan DNRE Director Humphries for being very cordial, well spoken & sticking to her guns, insisting that the lakes must be physically separated from the Mississippi drainage permanently.  Period.  Another stand-out was Professor Lodge from Notre Dame, the guy who has been developing the eDNA techniques that let us know where fish have been even if we can’t find the fish (which, as any fisherman will tell you, happens more than we care to admit).  He appeared to be a careful academic, and chose his words carefully in answering questions, even though you could tell that he wanted to say something like, “Just fill the damn canal in, will ya?”

Rep. Oberstar runs a good hearing.  He was even-handed and was respectful to everyone there, even thanking them several times for braving the east coast blizzard and the likely-hood of being stranded in town for a while.

My favorite part of the whole affair was when Chairman Oberstar drew a parallel between the environmental and human suffering that was inflicted on New Orleans by the MRGO canal, which also only sees very light and easily re-routed shipping traffic, to the CSSC, and asked the USACE officer if he couldn’t see closing the Chicago canals as being as beneficial as the closing of MRGO .  The USACE officer completely avoided answering the question but talked instead of the complexity of the engineering issues involved in Chicago and ways that they might regulate the locks differently, but not necessarily better.  I got the impression that it hurt the Corps feelings to be told to shut down MRGO, and they don’t want to close another cool, old, canal just because it has some problems that they can engineer more solutions for, if we give them more money.  Unfortunately, the most recent plan to put $78 million into band-aids won’t fix the problem, and there is still no permanent solution to the trans-basin migration of invasive alien species.

The Army Corps reminds me of a gear-head neighbor I used to have.  He didn’t have lots of money, but he loved tinkering on old cars just to prove that he could make them run again, if only for a short time.  This wasn’t Jay Leno pouring all the money needed into a project car to restore it to better-than-new condition.  He would fix one thing only to find another problem.  But he kept at it, because that’s what he liked to do.  At one point his wife told me that his hobby was, “Buying old, junk cars and working on them until he had to pay someone to haul them away.”   It was dirty, smelly, and loud work carried on in and around his garage.  The projects would sit around for months with no discernible progress being made.  The neighbors all grumbled.  But at least  it was his place and his money.

The Corps, on the other hand,  isn’t playing with their own land & money, but ours.  It’s time they were told that their canal and diversion projects at the south end of Lake Michigan need to go because they’re an eyesore, are creating a public nuisance, and are a health hazard.  As Chicago’s neighbors on the lake, we need to put our foot down and not let the tiny bit of out-dated commerce created by these dinosaurs ruin our property values.  And Chicago needs to clean-up their sewage like the rest of us and put the water back where they found it in no worse shape than when they borrowed it.  This won’t just benefit the Great Lakes, but the waterways and communities downstream from Chicago all the way to and including the Gulf of Mexico who are now getting, literally, shit upon.  You’d think that not having 2 billion gallons of water a day flowing down the river might help with downstream flooding a little as well, wouldn’t you?

What is complicated about getting a big suction dredge to the south end of the lake and filling the places where Lake Michigan leaks out with sand?  There are only about 6 of them from Burns Harbor, IN  to north of Chicago.  They could do it in a couple months, tops.  Then we would have a permanent physical separation of the Mississippi and Great Lakes drainages with no easy way for invasive alien species to cross from one to the other.

Just like it was before 19th Century Chicagoans “improved” it by building the canal in the first place.

EvernoteGoogle ReaderGoogle GmailDeliciousShare

Senator Stabenow & Representative Camp introduce the Carp Act. Finally!

Friday, January 22nd, 2010

This morning I found an email from Senator Debbie Stabenow’s office in my in-basket announcing that she and Dave Camp (R – Michigan), have introduced legislation to take immediate action against the Asian carp threat to the Great Lakes.

Here is an excerpt.

I have been working to ensure that federal and state experts have all the tools they need to protect the Great Lakes from the Asian carp, and so far, the efforts have been very successful. (?!?) However, the recent announcements by scientists are a troubling development that requires an urgent response. Therefore, the bills that Congressman Camp and I introduced call for immediate action to:

  • Immediately close the barriers and locks into the Great Lakes
  • Expedite the installation of interim barriers in rivers where no barriers currently exist
  • Enhance existing barriers and monitoring systems to prevent fish from crossing into the Great Lakes
  • Grant full authority to the Army Corps of Engineers to eradicate the Asian carp and prevent them from entering the Great Lakes.

As your Senator, I will continue to work to protect our Great Lakes, which are critical to our state’s livelihood. As always, please do not hesitate to contact me if I can be of assistance to you or your family.

Sincerely,

Debbie Stabenow

United States Senator

I would also like to see actions to permanently separate the Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal from Lake Michigan and stop the out of basin diversion of 2.1 billion gallons of our water daily; and for authority to eliminate the Asian Carp to go to the US Fish & Wildlife Service, but this is a good first step.

Please join us in contacting your elected help in DC and urging their support of this legislation and it’s immediate passage.

As always, I’d love to hear your take.

JP

###

EvernoteGoogle ReaderGoogle GmailDeliciousShare

Obama Unhappy With High Court’s Ruling

Thursday, January 21st, 2010

Seems the Prez is not pleased with the Supreme Court’s recent ruling on campaign finance.

I know how he feels.  I’ve been disappointed by the High Court a couple times myself.  Once when I was trying to build a rail trail in Indiana, and most recently when they decided Asian Carp aren’t a clear and present danger to the Great Lakes.

Well, all I can offer the President is my condolences, and the hope that eventually the court will be more centrist and less activist on the right-wing fringe.  I’ve been waiting for over 20 years.  He might want to grab a chair.

A Chair

JP

###

EvernoteGoogle ReaderGoogle GmailDeliciousShare

Army Corps failed to provide DNA evidence of Asian carp to high court

Thursday, January 21st, 2010

The US Army Corps of Engineers failed to inform the Solicitor General or the US Supreme Court that they had DNA evidence that the fish had entered Lake Michigan.  This was data that they had been sitting on for four days!  This makes it seem likely that they knew in time for the Supreme Court’s deliberations for a scheduled decision on Friday, January 15th, and didn’t pass it along then in an attempt to hide it from the Court.

For more details read this from the Detroit News.

Oh, the Army Corps!  Those scamps are always getting into trouble, aren’t they?  They need a firm hand to guide them back to the straight and narrow, because we know that left to their own devices they are bound for Hell in a basket.  Which is bad enough, but they are charged with looking after vast parts of our nation’s wetlands and waters, and their engineered solutions have not been generally good solutions (You can always tell an engineer.  But you can’t tell him very much!) for natural processes and biota. We can’t let the Corps take our wetlands and waters down with them!

The Corps needs to be under the oversight of Fish & Wildlife for all projects containing fish and wildlife.  When they are allowed to lead we get stuff like this, and the screwed-up plumbing nightmare that surrounds New Orleans.  They are good at engineering and building stuff, but they can’t be allowed to determine what they will build.  Unfortunately, they are often used by congress to send pork home to the district, when congress decides which projects get funding.  Either way, they fail to weigh the long-term ecological consequences almost every time.

JP

###

EvernoteGoogle ReaderGoogle GmailDeliciousShare

See! I told you!

Monday, January 18th, 2010

From the January 14, 2010 Chicago Tribune

10 Lake County suburbs look to tap Lake Michigan water

As I said a while back in What Climate Change May Mean For the Great Lakes , there is no way that communities that are running out of water are not going to be eying the Great Lakes.  The article also points out the cavalier attitude Illinois has shown for the upper limit of their allowable water withdrawal.  They are allowed 2.1 billion gallons a day, and they have a whopping surplus of about 50 million gallons to play with.  I’m guessing that this number is an average, not the summer peak flow.

It takes zero imagination to see the western communities mentioned getting their projects as long as Illinois promises, cross-their-hearts-and-hope-to-die!, that the total volume won’t exceed the allowed 2.1 billion gallons/day, and then claiming human suffering, public health, safety, and welfare needs trump the arbitrary limit and the rest of the Lakes’ users can go screw themselves.  There’s a reason they are called F.I.B.s (Fuckin’ Illinois Bastards).
(**Disclaimer:  I have lots of friends from Illinois, and it is filled with good people.  I’m not talking about them.  I’m talking about the FIBs.)

The actions of the Michigan AG and the joining states to seek relief through the US Supreme Court suddenly have even greater importance and urgency.  This is exactly like a small leak in an earthen dam which, unchecked, becomes a flood.  We must push for zero out-of-basin diversion for all Great Lakes waters!  We must eliminate the connection to the CSSC and the Mississippi River watershed to stop both out of basin flow and invasion by non-native biological pollution like Asian Carp!  Looking at the lakes historically we can see how they have become degraded by the invasion of alien organisms and pollution from farms, industry, and community sewer systems.  The ink on the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative is barely dry and we are fighting a battle over what should be a consensus action to save the lakes on which we all rely.  But as of today President Obama seems squarely behind Illinois, and the US Supreme Court has put off hearing the case that they were scheduled to act upon last Friday.

What do you think?  Am I just being paranoid, or is this obvious to everyone?

I’d really like to hear your opinions.

JP

###

EvernoteGoogle ReaderGoogle GmailDeliciousShare

Carp Wars

Wednesday, January 6th, 2010

Just before Christmas Michigan filed suit against the Army Corps of Engineers and the State of Illinois to stop the advance of Asian carp into Lake Michigan and to re-open a supreme court decree from the 1920′s allowing Chicago to divert billions of gallons from Lake Michigan Daily, the only major, permitted withdrawal of water from the Great Lakes watershed.  The water Chicago uses then flows down the Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal (CSSC) to the Illinois River, the Mississippi, and finally the Gulf of Mexico.  The diversion of this amount of water lowers the Lake Michigan / Lake Huron systems level by 3″.  But with a combined surface area of 117,400 square kilometers that equals over nine cubic kilometers, or about 2,403,965,676,459 gallons.  Now there’s a number even a congressman can see as significant.

The ultimate goal of the lawsuit, and of several regional and national environmental groups, is the closing of the CSSC and re-vamping of Chicago’s water treatment system to return the treated water into the Lake Michigan watershed, thus ending the diversion.  Sending their sewage down the Missippi made sense for Chicago and Lake Michigan in the 1900′s because the city generated an amazing amount of sewage that until the 1970′s was poorly treated at best.  (Probably not so good for the route to the gulf, though.)

The story of the threat of the carp to the Lakes has run in papers from the LA Times to the Wall Street Journal and on all the news networks.  The only people downplaying the risk are the Corps and some elected officials from Illinois who don’t want to change the status quo.  In the Washington Post’s December 22, 2009 edition they reported the following.

“They’ve been saying they have this under control, but they really don’t, and they’re going back to the status quo,” said John Sellek, a spokesman for the Michigan attorney general. “Their primary interest is keeping the waterway open, keeping that barge traffic on the canals. But Michigan’s interest is far larger than that. The Great Lakes fishing industry is worth $7 billion all by itself, let alone the hundreds of thousands of jobs that are connected to the Great Lakes.”

The Corps of Engineers and other federal, state and local authorities would probably be involved in closing the canals or other ecological separation measures, which could also be mandated through legislation.

If the canals were closed, barges could not travel from the Mississippi River into the Great Lakes. Freight would probably have to be transferred to trucks or rail cars and carried over land to Great Lakes ports. That would be a costly undertaking.

The national industry group for barge operators, which opposes closing the locks, says about a quarter-million truck trailers’ worth of goods make the passage annually on barges. But national environmental groups say the potential economic impact of Asian carp and other invasive species in the Great Lakes make freight reconfiguration worth the cost.

A 2008 study by the Alliance for the Great Lakes found that ecological separation could be economically beneficial and improve efficiency of freight transport.

The Natural Resource Defense Council has proposed that an environmentally sustainable intermodal freight facility be built to replace barge traffic into the lake, creating “green jobs” and curbing the invasive species risk.

“This way of moving goods may have made sense in the 19th century or 50 years ago, but are we still dependent on those same decisions?” asked Henry Henderson, NRDC Midwest program director. “We built a system without understanding the full implications. Now we have to design and build an engineered solution to a human-created problem.”

It’s time to bury the CSSC once and for all.  We can’t afford the ecological cost of the invasion of Asian carp or the loss of so much water.  And as I wrote in a previous post, Chicago is going to need more water soon, and they have established a precedent for out-of-basin diversion.  We must keep Great Lakes water in the Great Lakes, with no exceptions.

EvernoteGoogle ReaderGoogle GmailDeliciousShare
Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes
Proudly using Dynamic Headers by Nicasio WordPress Design