Bioregionalism

...now browsing by category

Topics and issues about responsibly living within our region’s means

 

Hot, Dry July

Tuesday, August 2nd, 2011

Global warming will have serious effects on the Great Lakes.  We rely on abundant water and cooler summer temperatures to keep the regional ecology stable and healthy, and for our giant tourism industry.

With only a half inch of rain recorded for all of July; a departure of 2.7-inches below normal precipitation amounts, Gaylord experienced the driest July on record, beating out 1965.

“That’s been 40 days since we’ve had a significant amount of rainfall,” said Halblaub.

Adding insult to injury for those who enjoy their weather on the normal side Gaylord’s July temperatures topped out at 71.2 degrees, 3.7 degrees above the mean normal average of 67.5 degrees. According to Halblaub the month tied for third with 1983 as the hottest July on record.

Source: The Gaylord (Michigan) Herald Times

EvernoteGoogle ReaderGoogle GmailDeliciousShare

The Spirit of the Lakes

Sunday, July 24th, 2011

Everyone who has spent time on and around the Great Lakes knows that they each have very  different personalities, and I believe that they each have that quality I call Spirit of Place.  You probably know exactly what I’m talking about if you’ve ever had a favorite or secret spot where you return again and again to seek peace and renewal.

The lakes’ personalities aren’t fixed, either.  They change with the weather, much like ours do.  Lake Michigan on a sunny summer day  is bright, alive, friendly and playful as a Golden Retriever puppy.  In the depths of winter she seems to be in hibernation unless she is awoken by a storm, then she is fierce and angry.  Lake Superior is more aloof and almost never as playful as Michigan, and she is awesome and terrifying in her storm persona.

I grew to really like the lakes from playing on the beaches of Michigan, Superior and Huron as a kid and young adult.  I grew to love them from sitting on the shore, in a cottage, car or tent staring out at their fury in a storm.  Watching a big storm build as it blows in across one of the Great Lakes reminds me of Wagnerian operas, only better because I know that here is the real deal, nature uncontrollable and raw; not someone’s interpretation of a great storm.  You would be no different out there than a wind-blown leaf, and you’d last about as long.  Again, Superior in storm is breathtaking and awe inspiring.  I never feel as small, helpless and insignificant as when watching Lake Superior go wild.  But there is a soul cleansing quality there as well.  Just as the storm cleans the air and the shore, it leaves me feeling refreshed and eager to get outside and enjoy that feeling that comes right after a storm and only lasts for an hour or so.

Have you fallen in love with the spirit of one of the Great Lakes?  When and how did it happen?

EvernoteGoogle ReaderGoogle GmailDeliciousShare

Help Save the Wild UP!

Saturday, July 23rd, 2011

A windy day on Lake Superior

 

The good folks at Save the Wild UP are among the hardest working environmental organizers around, and are fighting to stop a giant sulfide mine right on top of the headwaters of the Salmon Trout River in Michigan’s UP, a tributary to Lake Superior.  If you have the time, join them for their Protect the Earth Great Lakes Community Gathering, Saturday, August 6, 2011 in Champion, MI.

The purpose of the gathering is to seek ways in which the citizens of the Upper Great Lakes Region can work together more effectively to defend their water resources against the threat of new extraction projects.

Speakers will focus on proposed activity that threatens the health of the region including the controversial Eagle Project on the Yellow Dog Plains and Hud Bay’s proposed Front 40 Project for zinc and gold takings in Menominee Co., according to conference organizer Margaret Comfort.

Also on the program are “Fracking” of gas wells in lower Michigan, proposed extractive resource projects in the Penokee Hills of Wisconsin, and proposed copper-nickel sulfide projects in NE Minnesota, plus a special presentation on environmental justice and indigenous cultural issues.

The gathering is free to interested participants. It will begin with an optional walk at 9:00 a.m. from Koski’s Corner (intersection of US-41 and M-95) to the proposed Humboldt processing facility, approximately 2.5 miles round trip. The focus of the walk is to raise awareness of the importance of defending local water resources. Rides back to the cars will be available.

If you can’t be there in person, check out their web page at savethewildup.com, and send them good wishes!

 

Brian

EvernoteGoogle ReaderGoogle GmailDeliciousShare

Who Broke Wind?

Thursday, May 6th, 2010

Irish Windmills

I am as disgusted with the tragedy of coal and the un-sustainability and certain environmental trauma of oil as the next guy.  But I need to address the creeping, incipient danger of windmills.

I cannot imagine waking up some fine June morning on Michigan’s North Manitou Island, stretching, and crawling out of the tent for a glorious early morning wilderness whiz and seeing the image above.  Sure, I want to see us get to 350, but what’s the point if we have to live in an ugly fucking world to do it?  I’ve fought and spent my time and treasure over the years to keep wild places wild.  Now, many of my “environmental establishment” peers are standing behind wind power, even if it ruins vistas on the Great Lakes, to get rid of coal.

These are the same people who would be chaining themselves to trees if anyone suggested building a coal or nuke power plant in the same areas, and would be screaming not just about pollution, but the loss of the aesthetic resources we enjoy now as a society!  “No factory on the People’s Land!”

But you substitute a windmill for a nuke plant and suddenly everyone goes brain dead!!  What the Hell are these people thinking?!?  Ugly, industrial development is Ugly. Industrial, Development – regardless of the source of power!  Who is feeding these otherwise sane people the purple kool-aide?

(For a look at the pros and cons sans vitriol, click here.)

The “Environmental Establishment” (and I’m not a James Sheehan fan, btw) has given up on trying to sell zero population growth and reducing our consumption of shared resources because it was too hard to raise money from rich people if you told them they shouldn’t live in McMansions.  What Happened?

Well, they need to remember what the  issues are here and get back on message!  No amount of alternative energy is going to matter one little bit unless we get a grip on our own reproduction.  We need to reduce our reproductive mean to zero.  Replacement is the only justifiable goal of procreation, and individuals who elect to not have children (and as the father of the two most amazing children in all of creation I can’t imagine the sadness they would have to live with) should be given clear title to McMansions that used to belong to idiots with 9 kids.

But regardless of that, I don’t want to live in some bad Kevin Costner movie with windmills all over my Great Lakes and north woods (or, should you be a fan of Longfellow, the Great Lakes of the Northland).  These are actual holy sites for many of us, and to suggest that we just suck it up and allow ugly fucking windmills to be liberally sprinkled all over them is heresy!!

Now, if the Man wants to talk reasonably about how and where we should site these industrial facilities, I’m ready to sit down.  But if they are simply going to say, “I’m from the government (or environmental establishment) , I’m here to help, trust me.”  I am going to kick their ass from here to Copper Harbor, know what I mean?  There is no excuse for fucking up wild places, I don’t care who you are, or what your motives are.  Wild is the most limited resource on earth.  The surface of the Great Lakes is one of the largest wild areas left in the world, and I refuse to let it become fucked up without a fight.  What do you think?  Leave a comment below.

EvernoteGoogle ReaderGoogle GmailDeliciousShare

Good Food, Healthy Earth

Monday, February 15th, 2010

I am very concerned about the cumulative effects on our environment and economy from the dependence on using high levels of petroleum-based materials in the average farming operation today, though it may be getting better in this era of peak oil.  I am equally concerned about the impact that irrigation, soil erosion and agricultural run-off is having on our water resources globally.  The effects of the combination of these activities includes the Dead Zone in the Gulf of Mexico, and depletion of ground water aquifers, lakes, rivers and streams world-wide, not just here in the USA.

As a result of all of this I have become a fan of Community Supported Agriculture (CSA), grass-fed meat and poultry, organic farming and Integrated Pest Management.  I believe that it is imperative that food production become local, sustainable and right-sized, and the sooner the better!  In addition to producing healthy, fresh, GOOD food, it will strengthen our local economies and reconnect our communities.

We’re seeing more of this type of agriculture every year, and we will see more if we will change our buying habits to encourage the farmers that embrace these principles.

EvernoteGoogle ReaderGoogle GmailDeliciousShare

Sustaining Farms

Monday, January 25th, 2010

The farming life touches a deep emotional chord in most Americans.  Most of us aren’t that far removed from the farm, particularly here in the Midwest.  The choice to be a farmer or rancher is very much a lifestyle choice, but most of us don’t understand what a difficult business farming is today.

I was born in Bloomington, Illinois and spent my early childhood in Chenoa, before my family moved to Fairmount, Indiana, another farm town about 180 miles to the east.  While my father didn’t farm, my grandfather and several friends & relatives did. I couldn’t avoid playing and working on farms while growing up, and taking vocational agriculture classes in school.  My mother ran the office for the local ag-chemical company and we were all very aware of the ups and downs of the farm economy and the demands of each season.  I was in high school in the 1970’s, consumed with all of the typical high school things, but even so I saw too many of my friends’ families go from full-time farmers, to part-time farmers, to losing their farms as government policies, production methods, commodity prices, interest rates, and real estate taxes seemed to conspire against them.  I saw many 80 and 160 acre farms gobbled up by giant industrial operations owned by corporations or investors like insurance companies.  I’m sure it was a great improvement in efficiency, but it helped kill small communities all across the nation.

USA Today’s Mort Zuckerman recently wrote, “Just think: In 1800, about three quarters of the U.S. labor force was devoted to agriculture. Today, it is less than 3 percent.”

Making more of the general public aware of what farming today has evolved into, and bringing communities closer to food production and an understanding of how agriculture impacts their lives beyond food production (water & land use, effect on water quality, air quality, regional employment, and so many other areas) will be key to increasing the sustainability of our farms, ranches, and ultimately our communities themselves.  We really need to restore that community connection we lost when we lost the small family farm, and there is a movement to do just that.  How?  By bringing back the small family farm, V 2.0.

EvernoteGoogle ReaderGoogle GmailDeliciousShare

Industrial Disease

Wednesday, January 20th, 2010

In  a piece titled, The attack of the killer everything, the BBC’s Richard Black makes a pretty good case for the world-wide decline in amphibians and bees being linked to the piling on of environmental stress including lack of habitat, food, and perhaps most interesting, diversity.

Bee & Butterfly

So its not just humans who are not eating properly, not using sunblock, exposed to toxic chemicals in our air and water, and living in environments that we were not adapted to emotionally and psychologically.

This unhealthy environment is cause for concern, and one reaction to it has been the rise of the “Smart Growth” movement.  Over at the Huffington Post, Seth Bauer interviewed one of the deans of Smart Growth, Architect Andres Duany, who has written a new book titled, appropriately enough, The Smart Growth Manual. From the article:

Duany began by identifying three concurrent crises that he traced directly to the American lifestyle: Peak oil (the likelihood that we’ve already consumed more than half the planet’s petroleum in barely 100 years), the housing bubble, and global climate change. “It’s where we live, the size of our houses, the distances we drive for work, commerce, play–everything.”

And there’s a brutal irony to our long record of poor choices, Duany says: Other countries are emulating it. As they become wealthier per capita, it’s the American lifestyle that they aspire to, the one that has undermined our health, our social engagement, and our environment. He laughs. “In some ways, it’s our only chance,” he says, of staying on top. “We can ruin China by making extremely unpleasant places for them.” What justifies density is urbanism, he says. “You give up your back yard for street life. But they’re getting neither. They’re getting Tyson’s Corner.”

The solution for all of us is to make choices for land use based on good science, not what is expedient or produces the highest short-term gain.  So,  “The solutions to this oversized, expensive, and planet-killing misery, Duany says, are simple, obvious, and nearly impossible to implement.”

I know how tiring it can get to keep hearing this, and it does seem that we’ve been saying it for years, but the need for more environmental education among all peoples is critical to initiating any needed changes.  There is probably a majority of people who don’t see a problem if we lose amphibians and bees all together.  They don’t know what they are “good for.”  We are at Earth Day +40 years, and though we have made gains, we still have far to go, and it’s getting late.

By allowing biological diversity to continue to diminish we are rushing toward a day when our planet won’t be able to support us.  But relying on enlightened self interest fails to take into account the “what good is it?” argument.  We must reach that point where frogs, bees, bluebells and brown trout have standing and are seen as legitimate stakeholders.  Because right now we are treating the planet like almost all empires have treated indigenous peoples.  They aren’t like me, they don’t vote, they have something I want, they have to go.  But we do this at our peril.

A great illustration of this is the new movie “Avatar.”  If you haven’t seen it yet, go!  Or rent the disc when it comes out and watch it with an awareness that it is a warning against our specie’s ignorance and avarice that rings true.

We need to start a foundation and a telethon to find a cure for Industrial Disease before it’s too late.

JP

###

EvernoteGoogle ReaderGoogle GmailDeliciousShare
Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes
Proudly using Dynamic Headers by Nicasio WordPress Design